INTEGRATION PROCESS USING KINESIOLOGY
The extended mind – the real internet
Cyber-kinetics kinesiology – essentially a form of verifying and falsifying information. The body mind is part of what is called the extended mind or ‘mind at large.’ The akashik record is a memory of all that was. When muscle testing we are bringing awareness to something. It has the qualities that we do. This includes memory, cognizance & energy. It is us and more. It is important to be very specific with the questioning and ask question as a statement. If the client is associated a question will work. So in practical terms ask ‘It is’ not ‘is it.’
Many energetic systems lack a methodology for specifying the information
Many systems recognise energy as an important component to healing but don’t detail information. Energy is potential capacity. As we move through life certain experience affects us very much. The sense that we make then determines how we respond in future to similar events. This is our conditioning. A lot of behaviours are very subtle. We attend to certain things repeatedly. It’s the compulsion in a particular action that is the problem. Language is a representation of inner organ sensation / outer world perception. We use language to get a handle on the felt sense that someone has about something. It gives us a frame of reference to begin exploring the inner world.
Cyber-kinetics which is about the storage and retrieval of information allows us to work with information (in the form of identification). The EFT allows us to process energy. The energy is what gives an idea its potency. The model developed is based on the hindu idea of subtle body’s. Nine body’s (each layer of the aura). Each body is associated with certain themes e.g. physical – fulfillment etc. For each body there are 3 themes so with nine we have 27 in total.
Dimensions of Being
The belief systems have a nuclei. These themes are the nuclei in that the experience relates to certain ideals. These ideals are contexts within consciousness. The context is what the beliefs are in relation to. The meaning we give things is always context dependent. They are implicit. The benefit of this model is that through explicating this aspect of the problem it allows new avenues of enquiry, and brings new awareness to the equation. Essentially you can ask about what is important about X (e.g. having a relationship). This allows an abstraction which can be useful when someone is too lost in story. This model starts to identify where the value is placed or how an experience is being evaluated, against what standard. The discomfort in a problem is due to the perception of an unmet expectation. Expectations are against a standard, often unspoken.
It is the accumulation and condensation of the group mind which forms a canopy which the individual swims in. It is when there is an activation of this group mind attractor field that an influence is exerted on the psyche of the individual..
Part / whole / larger whole
A belief – part belief system – whole constellation (belief systems) – larger whole
De-conditioning one constellation will radically alter the personality. Often people have 7 or 8 (less or more) of these constellations. Each constellation can be seen as a type of consciousness. The personality is multi faceted. The personality or the identity is synonymous with the symptom. The body is dense structured thought. As you process the belief systems the integrity of the human body field is restored which in turn informs the body which can restructure itself
Fractal structure
The fractal is a good representation to help understand the constellation. Self similar repeating symmetry or as Stanislav Grof noticed COEX systems – condensed experience associated around a core template (theme). The symptom is emergent from a multiplicity of beliefs. Conflict shocks do cause body to express symptoms also, often are the precipitating factor but people have resolved conflicts and nothing has changed. Either they had inaccurate information or as now seems the case, the conflict is just the tip of an iceberg.
Modelling experience
A universal modelling tool (process methodology) is the idea of detailing, scoping and connecting. The system identifies what is most significant, scopes the problem, what is involved and very importantly which connections and relationships should be looked at. For a healing system to be systemic it has to be able to identify relationships between the parts. With cyber-kinetics we can be very precise in regards to this..
We use the muscle testing to explore thought systems i.e beliefs. Belief systems are intimately tied up with the autonomic nervous system. You can see this because when core beliefs are challenged the physiology activates. This can be strong emotion or sensorial effects like trembling lips, shallow breathing etc
We have scoped the problem, identified the belief systems and are now ready for processing. The thought identified from a scan chart is a representation in codified form (written word). This is essentially a hook for client to start referencing experience of theirs. As they start exploring this we extract the problematic thinking. This is the meaning they have made. The identification is a definitive judgement about the self / other or world they have made. It feels true to them. It is not so much what they believe but the fact that they are now less flexible. They are less open, less adaptable and more easily affected by certain experiences due to this fixed point of view. It also shows up as habitual attending, checking, strong negative feeling, repetitive thought patterns & dysfunctional actions.
When doing integration we are exploring the why and if possible the connections. The system guides so when asked what we are doing and what should be focused on it says inner conflict and suppressed emotion are the key. It also highlighted the higher self. It took me a while to work out what it meant but I was not utilising this in the process enough. My friend had said that precision was important. An integration I had done also had bought the importance of connections to my attention. We had hit this idea that I didn’t trust what I knew (what I saw). Then we asked body
There is a belief causing this – this is so we don’t assume. It said yes. What? It turned out that upstream I had this belief that it is best not to think you know something as this traps you in a fixed point of view. Essentially I forbade myself from knowing – this of course was very subconscious..the consequence was that I would repeatedly check certain things. The problem involved requires more work as is emergent from a multiplicity of aspects but did highlight the usefulness of the kinesiology particularly when client is stuck with their understanding.
The body (omniscient) also said look at connections, my friend reminding me of need for precision and the demonstration on myself with the insight it allowed prompted me to make the use of kinesiology more structured within integration work. We were using it but only when we were stuck. The idea now was to use it in a focused way. When we do integration we are going within.
Understanding the relationships is fundamental
The feedback so far has been good from clients as the pressure is off them to know what to reference. The conversations are now quite different and the modelling of experience is more true to what really occurs in life. We noticed that within a particular thought stream there a number of key limiting decisions, beliefs and core memories. The connection the client made were relevant and significant but were they the most significant and important connections. Rather than their conscious mind identifying these we now allow their subconscious mind to give us this information. What is connected, how and why are they connected?
Why integration method works
Integration work in part works because we objectify their subjective experience. This is curative due to the fact that acknowledging and explicating the experience dis-embeds them from their subjectivity. It is no longer how ‘I am’ but is an experience ‘I am having / doing.’ The kinesiology is more objective than their personal referencing in that the feedback is shared / felt by two i.e client and facilitator..it is harder to doubt the relevance whereas sometimes the client will be wondering – should I be sharing this, am I on the right track, especially if they are someone who is self doubting. Also just bringing awareness to the relationships generates insight and this stimulates growth also.
A comment on process
As you start processing with client you hit a core belief. Tap and deframe as per usual then ask if any belief / thought is informing this..if yes identify from menus, then ask does this need processing. Sometimes the thought is just for awareness. Continue this until stream complete. Invariably the last thought will be easily recognisable as very significant and the basis for the other thoughts. Sometimes this is not obvious
If you don’t ask you won’t know
This alteration seems so obvious but it is only through experience that slowly you start to see new patterns, develop new understanding and do things differently. We have the advantage that the kinesiology (accesses awareness) seems to be teleological (works towards development & growth of the person) and has the capacity to mentor you. You do have to ask though to sift through the different possible answers..
Conclusion
Through naturalistic modelling (feedback / change / feedback) we have developed a formal model. This model has been developed in part due to the kinesiology. We can measure whether something is completely done. If not we continue. The aim is to see whether we can consistently resolve symptoms. The advantage of a formal model is that it highlights gaps in the thinking. The model takes ideas from systems thinking which recognises emergence / simultaneity. It seems like fractal geometry is a good model for the structure of these problems. Wilhelm Reich noted that an identification was essentially a concentration of energy. This shows up in the depth of feeling connected to a thought. It’s like a stasis of sorts. The model has also given us inner contexts, there are also 13 key survival functions associated with the constellations.
Contexts within consciousness – Issue is ABOUT….
Physical Fulfillment Survival Stability
Etheric Trauma Manipulation Appearances
Emotional Self image Initiative Vanity
Mental Expression Skills Independence
Astral Impulse Instinct Trust
Etheric template Manifestation Intelligence Communication
Celestial Romance Love relationships Self Knowledge
Ketheric Template Grace Joy Creativity
Transpersonal Awareness Service Commitment
Function – survival strategies
Control Will
Stability Discovery
Domination Detachment
Manipulation Appearances
Critical Crazy
Resistance Allure
Concede
Meta-Health Mind Body 